c04fig003.jpg

Change in frequency of a rare allele under Positive Directional Selection
Dominant, Additive Semi-Dominant, & Recessive cases

    In a single-locus model with two alleles A1 and A2, let  initial q = f(A2) = 0.001. The three curves trace f(A2) over time for three modes of dominance. The Blue curve shows the case where A2 is dominant to A1 (W22 = W12 W11). The Red curve shows an additive (semi-dominance) model, in which each A2 allele decreases fitness by the same amount, such that W22 W12   W11. The Green curve shows the case where A2 is recessive to A1 (W11 = W12 W22). The differences between the shapes of the curves reflect how mean population fitness () varies as q = f(A2 1.0.

    Remember: the dominance relationships of the two alleles with respect to fitness are fixed genetically, according to whether the A1A2 heterozygote is more similar to the A1A1 or A2A2 homozygotes. It is not determined by the phenotypic values themselves.

    The information in the graph also shows the fate of a common allele under negative directional selection, IF the Y-axis values were inverted top to bottom ( 0) and labelled f(A1) = p. That is, the behavior of the two alleles at a locus are complementary for any particular dominance model.

HOMEWORK: (1) As part of the lab exercises, show that these curves can be obtained with the appropriate selection coefficients (s) in the Hardy - Weinberg selection programs GSM in Excel, or natsel in Python. (2) Prove the complementarity of the behavior of the dominant and recessive alleles.


Figure revised after © 2019 Sætre & Ravinet; Text material © 2024 by Steven M. Carr