Divergence in structured vs unstructured populations
Numbers of migration events required in genetically structured vs un-structured populations

     Consider a population of 16 individuals distributed over four populations. All populations originate from one of the four populations [shown here in blue, but the color makes no difference]. (a) If the data show that all the individuals in any one population are members of the same genetic lineage (the populations are distinct), the distribution can be explained by a minimum of L=3 migration events (cross-bars), to establish four distinct populations. (b) If the data show that all populations consist of equal numbers of individuals from the different lineages (the populations are homogeneous), this distribution requires a minimum of L=12 migration events.  (c) If the population comprises two sub-populations whose members are from two separate lineages, and the two sub-populations are heterogeneous, the distribution can be explained by a minimum of L=9 events. However, (e) if one of the sub-populations is itself structured as two distinct sub-populations, for a total of three sub-populations, a minimum of L=6 migration events is required, and (d) If the structure is basically as in (e), but the two sub-sub-populations are not completely distinct, a minimum of L=7 migration events is required.

    Structured populations required fewer migration events than do random populations, and the number increases as the structure decreases. As the number of individuals increases, the range of the number of events increases, and the number of events required by the observed tree can be compared with the lengths of trees drawn at random.


Figure © from Carr et al. 2015;Text © 2024 by Steven M Carr