Midterm Examination questions, Winter 2016 [Final Set, posted 22 Feb 2016]

Instructions: Prepare answers for all questions. FOUR of these questions will be chosen at random for the midterm. Your may answer ANY TWO of these. You MAY NOT answer the question based on your group’s presentation. Answers should be no longer than one side of an 8.5x11 sheet; you may sketch an outline on the reverse. Answers will be graded on the expectation that you have written out answers to all questions ahead of time, and that the examination paper is only a check that this has been done.

1.       Radiation Genetics & Health Physics: Consider a lab accident involving 10 uCi of a gamma- versus an alpha-emitter. Which would you rather be exposed to at 1 meter? Which would you rather swallow? Explain your reasoning..

2.       Consider the Luria-Delbruck thought experiments for the induction and mutation models. Calculate the mean and variance of each experiment after two further generations. How do these calculations relate to the statistical design of the experiment?

 

3.       The Hershey & Chase (1952) experiment has been criticized as being "quick and dirty". In Figure 1 of the experiment, what result would you expect to obtain if all phage protein remained outside, and all phage nucleic acid went inside the bacterial cells? What are some explanations

 

4.       Watson and (or) Wilkins have been criticized for miss-use of data from Franklin. Based on the evidence presented in lecture, to what extent is the criticism justified? Give the facts and explain your reasoning. Which is more critical to understanding the genetic properties of DNA, its double helical structure or specific base-pairing? Explain your reasoning.

 

5.       Meselson & Stahl (1958) use analytical centrifugation to demonstrate the semi-conservative mode of DNA replication. Sketch the banding patterns that would be expected if DNA replication were conservative, or dispersive. At what stage of the original experiment can the conservative and dispersive models be ruled out? Explain.

 

6.       McClintock (1953) cross analysis: Based on the genetics of the Ac-Ds system, explain the phenotypes of the three kernels in Table 1.

 

7.    King & Wilson (1975) calculated from an electrophoretic similarity of S' = 0.52 that chimps and humans were >99% genetically similar. (1) Suppose instead the data set included 20 loci that share an identical allele between species, and 20 loci at which each species has a separate allele. Summarize the data table. (2) Calculate S. (3) Calculate the genetic similarity between species; show your calculations.

 

8.       Nirenberg et al. (1965) deciphered the first four codons of the genetic code by use of poly U, C, A, and G, and a further set by use of all possible dinucleotide combinations (UA, UC, UG, CA, CG, AG, etc). (1) Show which additional codons can be deciphered by the use of dinucleotide polymer messages. What does this information indicate about degeneracy of the code? (2) Consider a poly-U message ‘spiked’ with small amounts of A, or C, or G: what additional codons, and what information about degeneracy would be shown?

 

9.       Gill et al. (1994): Consider an alternate scenario for recovery of the remains of the Romanov family, given below. The remains include five children, a single adult female, and three adult males. It is assumed that these include the Tsar, Tsarina, all five of the children, and two males associated with the family. Five STR loci were examined, each with four alleles designated A-E as necessary.
    1) Identify the Tsar. Show that the STR genotypes of each child is consistent with parentage by the Tsar an Tsarina.
    2) Show that the other two males are not the Tsar. Explain your reasoning.
    3) Notice anything unusual? Explain

       Hint: For any two parents, there are a maximum of four (A,B,C,D) and a minimum of one (A) alleles segregating at any locus. There are also five intermediate configurations of two- (A,B,C) and three- (A,B) allele parental genotypes. Writing out these seven combinations, and the types of offspring each can produce, may assist.


Alternative STR genotypes


Text material ©2016 by Steven M Carr