I summon the supernatural beings
Who first contrived
The transmorgifications
In the stuff of life.
You did it for your own amusement.
Descend again, be pleased to reanimante
This revival of those marvels.
Reveal, now, exactly
How they were performed
From the beginning
Up to this moment.
Ovid: Metamorphoses
(trans. Ted Hughes)
Biology in the 18th century
The Classical
Tradition: Plato & Aristotle (4th
cent. BCE)
Theory
of Forms (essences,
eidos)
'real' objects are manifestations of 'ideal' forms
variation is illusory [see Plato "The
Republic"]
Dichotomy:
the world is composed of paired opposites
"A" versus "not A" classes
good / bad, right / wrong, up / down, light / dark, male / female, etc.
e.g., vertebrates vs. invertebrates
Aristotle
- "Father of Biology"
Five books on zoology ("Generation
of Animals")
Biological structures have purpose: Efficient versus Final
Causes
Natural
Theology:
"The Wisdom of God, Manifested
in His Creation"
(John Ray
1627-1705)
'Ideal' forms exist in the Mind of God:
'real' world created by God (Genesis
1:1)
"Natural Theology"
(1802) (William Paley)
The Argument from Design: a watch
presupposes a Watchmaker
Scala
Naturae: the "Great Chain of
Being"
Creation is an infinitely graduated progressive series
Time scale is short (ca. 6,000 years)
Living forms are static: no new forms, no change, no extinction
The study of nature is a pious activity
Linnean
Taxonomy (Carl von Linne [Carolus
Linneaus]
1707 -1778)
"Systema Naturae" (10th
ed., 01 January 1758: "Birthday of
Systematics")
4,162 animals described
binomial nomenclature: genus
+ species names
"ad majorem Dei gloriam": for the greater glory of God
Exploration
creates a Scientific Crisis
New
forms are discovered that don't fit the Scala
Extinctions
have evidently occurred
Variation
is real in space: what about over time?
Biology in the early 19th century:
Change
has occurred, how do we explain it?
The
Enlightenment
favors rational explanation.
Jean
Baptiste de Lamarck
(1744 -1829):
"Zoological Philosophy" (1809)
New features arise due to persistent "besoin" (need / want)
(teleological: a goal-directed
explanation)
Use and disuse alter morphology:
Altered morphology is passed on to offspring
(Lamarckism: inheritance of acquired characteristics)
Ex.: Giraffes stretch
their
necks to feed on leaves.
Successive generations gradually acquire longer necks.
[or, trees become taller to escape giraffes]
Therefore, organisms
change (evolve)
over
time
Uniformitarianism
replaces
Catastrophism
in
geology
Charles
Lyell
(1797 -1875): "Principles of Geology"
(1830)
Observable,
gradual processes + enormous time = world as we know it
The Darwinian Revolution
Charles
Darwin
(1809 -1882)
B.Sc. (Cambridge): pre-med
Naturalist on board HMS "Beagle"
(1831-36) over father's objections
Capt. Robert FitzRoy, RN
South
America: extinction is real
Galapagos:
variation is real
"The
Voyage of the Beagle"
(1839): a
best-seller
Examined collections
closely:
transmutations in time &
space are real (March 1837)
Read Robert
Malthus "On
Population" (Sept - Oct 1838):
population increases exponentially, resources
increase arithmetically
Extensive study of Artifical
Selection by plant & animal breeders
Married Emma
Wedgwood (Jan 1839)
Materialism: "I
deserve to be called a theist" ;
[Death of Annie Darwin ,1851]
Sketches of 1842
& 1844:
"Natural means of selection" / "Picking"
"It
is like confessing a murder."
Letter from Alfred Wallace
(1823-1913) in June
1858
"On the Origin of
Species" (1859) [online
text]
Observation: In any species, more young are born than can possibly survive.
Observation: Yet a species' numbers do not increase without limit.
CONCLUSION: There is a Struggle
for Survival,
and differential survival and reproduction occur
within species.
[Darwin: "I use 'struggle' in a
large
and metaphorical sense..."].
Observation: Individuals within
species show variation
that affects the probability that they will survive this struggle and
leave offspring.
CONCLUSION: Those individuals
that
survive and reproduce do so in consequence
of their
"adaptively superior" variation
(they
are "more fit")
This
process
of differential survival and reproduction is called Natural
Selection.
Observation: Variation is heritable:
offspring tend to resemble their parents.
["Hard
inheritance" is sufficient: Mendel and genetics
were unknown in 1859).
CONCLUSION:
Adaptively superior variation will be inherited by the offspring
generation.
That is,
evolution occurs as descent with modification.
Putting
it another way....
"Natural
Selection" describes an evolutionary process in which
"adaptation" occurs in such a way that "fitness"
increases.
Under certain conditions, this results in descent with modification.
If:
variation
exists for some trait, and
a fitness difference is correlated
with that trait, and
the trait is to some degree heritable
(determined by genetics),
Then:
the trait distribution will change
over the life history of organisms in a single generation,
and
between generations.
The
process
of change is called "adaptation"
That's
all.
Natural
Selection
provides a mechanism for Evolution:
Modern evolutionary theory seeks to clarify this mechanism.
The
observable
order
in Nature is due to common
descent
from an ancestor:
Organisms resemble each other because they are related.
The
degree
of relationship provides a basis for "natural
classification":
Taxonomy should reflect the phylogeny
of organisms.
All living
things are related (the basic fact of biology):
Humans
have evolved from other animals (Darwin (1871)
"Descent of Man")
"The main conclusion arrived at in this work,
namely that man is descended from some lowly organised form,
will, I regret to think, be highly
distasteful
to many."
Thomas Huxley
(1825-1895) "Man's Place in Nature"
(1863)
established similarity and relationship to Great Apes
"Nothing
in Biology makes sense, except in the light of Evolution." (Th. Dobzhansky, 1975)
Natural Selection may be the most
misunderstood
concept in biology.
Not "Survival
of the Fittest"
Herbert
Spencer
(1820 - 1903) "Synthetic Philosophy"
Phrase
introduced in
1864, advocated by Wallace, accepted by Darwin
the
"naturalistic fallacy": 'is'
= 'ought'
Social Darwinism: Does
"Survival of the Fittest" support
British imperial ambition
American
laissez faire capitalism
Negative
Eugenics ?
"A deduction
killed by a fact"
[T. H. Huxley]
not
phenotype-specific mortality
not
predation (nor
inter-species
competition
of unrelated species)
not
"Nature
red in tooth
and claw"
Darwin:
plants in desert 'struggle' for water
not
equivalent to population growth:
evolving populations may decline:
density-dependent growth in Atlantic
Cod
Not equivalent to evolution
Natural
Selection may conserve existing types (stabilizing
selection).
Evolutionary
change ultimately requires new variation (mutation &
recombination).
Paradox: Natural
Selection may or may not explain the "Origin of Species"
Migration,
population structure, genetic drift are important.
Not a tautology
(a self-evident statement; a circular argument)
"Why
do they survive? Cuz they're fit.
How do you know they're fit? Cuz they survive..."etc.
More
like
a syllogism (an if - then
statement;
a logical consequence):
(2 & W
& h2)
=> q
[cf. physics: F = M A depending on
definitions of
Force,
Mass, & Acceleration
arithmetic: 1 + 2 = 3 because I and II make
III]
The
process can be represented in non-deterministic genetic
models
variation, fitness, and heritability are all quantifiable in
nature
Falsifiability
as a demarcator of Science (Karl Popper)
Fleming
Jenkin on blending inheritance: cf. Darwin's theory of pangenesis
Lord Kelvin on the Age of the Earth:
insufficient time (with nuclear
solar energy)
Not "Mother
Nature"
not
a force, not a thing that
acts
We don't say, "Arithmetic causes one plus two to equal three."
We might say, "One plus two equals three. That's arithmetic.
not
good or bad (amoral)
no noun
/ verb / object distinctions
In most languages, "nouns verb objects"
i.e., objects perform actions on other objects: Not
Not teleological (goal-directed):
Evolution
does not have "goal", "direction", or "purpose"
Homo sapiens are not the endpoint of evolution!
Evolution is not necessarily "progressive"
variation
& "complexity" do not increase uniformly
Avoid
such phrases as "Natural Selection acts ..."
"in
order to ...",
"for the purpose of ...",
"so that ...",
"because its trying to ..."
Janet Browne (1995).
Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Knopf
(2002).
Charles Darwin: The Power of Place. Knopf.
Daniel C. Dennet (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea.
Beacon
Loren Eisley (1959). Darwin's Century. Doubleday.
Stephen Jay Gould (2002). The Structure of
Evolutionary Theory. Harvard.
Richard Hofstader (1955). Social Darwinism in
American Thought, 1860 -1915 (rev. ed.). Beacon.
William Irvine (1955). Apes, Angels, and Victorians:
Darwin, Huxley, & Evolution.
McGraw-Hill.
Ernst Mayr (1994). One Long Argument [see especially
Chapter
4: Darwin's Path]. Harvard
University Press.
Web
resouces:
John van Wyhe (ed.), The writings of Charles
Darwin on the web (http://pages.britishlibrary.net/charles.darwin/)
Brief biography of Darwin by John van Wyhe [http://pages.britishlibrary.net/charles.darwin3/darwin_bio.htm]
Course notes for Bio2900 - Principles of Evolution &
Systematics
Extract from PBS special "Darwin's
Dangerous Idea": Natural Selection in 10 minutes